Author: admin

  • Market Wrap for the Week Ending 31 Oct 2025

    US Stock Market Breadth Starting To Narrow

    Although Tech is leading the advanced, thanks to a slew of positive earnings results and huge backlog orders, the rest of the market is weak. Key cyclicals like consumer discretionary, financials and industrials have struggled, especially when seen on an equal weight basis (takes away the impact of mega-cap stocks). Investors need to watch if this phenomenon can be resolved, if not it is likely that the stock market outlook in Q1 of 2026 could be weak.

    Flood of AI-related Bond Issuance

    The FT has an article “Credit market hit with $200B food of AI related issuance” for 2025. The top companies listed were Meta ($30B) and Oracle ($18B). Other notable companies include Softbank and the Chinese Internet giants. As more companies fund their AI investment via debt markets, financial discipline becomes more important, especially if interest rate rises. This is likely to add pressure on these AI companies to begin monetising the AI assets sooner, rather than later.

    US and China Announced A Deal (Truce?)

    The meeting between Trump and Xi in South Korea produced a framework trade truce. China agrees to buy US soybeans (after pausing for the past several months), ease some rare earth export controls for 1 year, and step up control on fentanyl drugs exports. In turn, US eased up on the tariffs (down to 47% from 57%). This is no deal, but it does help both countries buy time to buffer their economies against further damaging actions. If economic resilience does not improve by then (e.g. rare earth self-sufficiency), it would likely hit the economy and investors’ confidence again.

     

  • How the Latest U.S. Sanctions on Russian Oil Producers Affect China’s Energy Imports

    Overview

    The United States has expanded sanctions to include Rosneft PJSC and Lukoil PJSC, Russia’s two largest oil producers. The measures freeze U.S. assets and prohibit American entities from doing business with them. More importantly, they introduce secondary sanctions, threatening non-U.S. firms that continue significant transactions with these companies via the U.S. financial system.

    These sanctions aim to tighten restrictions on Russia’s energy revenues — but they also have significant implications for China, which has become Russia’s largest oil customer since 2022.

    China’s Dependence on Russian Oil

    China remains heavily reliant on Russian crude:

    In 2024, China imported around 108.5 million metric tonnes of Russian crude oil — roughly 2.17 million barrels per day, or about 18–19% of its total crude imports. Russia has been China’s top oil supplier for two consecutive years, surpassing Saudi Arabia. Much of this crude is transported through the Eastern Siberia–Pacific Ocean (ESPO) pipeline and by sea via the Pacific ports of Kozmino and Primorsk.

    Impact of Sanctions on China

    1. Oil Supply Risk

    The sanctions complicate Russia’s ability to export crude, particularly seaborne shipments that rely on Western-linked shipping, insurance, and financial services.

    While pipeline flows via the ESPO route continue largely unaffected, seaborne cargoes face disruption and delays.

    As a result, some Chinese state-owned refiners have begun curbing purchases of Russian oil linked to Rosneft or Lukoil until compliance risks are clarified.

    2. Higher Costs and Reduced Discounts

    China has benefitted from deeply discounted Russian crude since 2022, as Moscow redirected exports away from Western markets.

    However, as sanctions tighten, shipping and insurance costs rise and the pool of non-sanctioned vessels shrinks. This erodes the discounts Chinese refiners previously enjoyed, potentially narrowing refining margins.

    3. Financial and Reputational Risks

    The inclusion of secondary sanctions introduces new compliance risks for Chinese banks and trading houses.

    Transactions that touch the U.S. dollar system or involve Western intermediaries could expose them to penalties or loss of access to international markets.

    Consequently, larger Chinese firms are becoming more cautious, leaving smaller independent refiners (“teapots”) to handle most Russian cargoes through intermediaries.

    China’s Workarounds

    Despite these constraints, China can technically continue buying Russian oil — provided transactions avoid the U.S. financial system. Key adaptations include:

    Settling trade in yuan or rubles, rather than U.S. dollars. Using non-Western shipping and insurance networks, including Russian and Middle Eastern insurers. Receiving pipeline deliveries, which bypass maritime sanctions altogether. Employing smaller or state-linked banks to process payments outside SWIFT.

    These workarounds allow the flow of Russian oil to continue, albeit at higher operational cost and with elevated compliance risk.

    Strategic and Geopolitical Implications

    China’s continued purchases underscore its energy security strategy and desire to reduce exposure to the U.S. dollar. Russia, in turn, is deepening ties with China through long-term crude and LNG supply contracts and expanded pipeline infrastructure. Over time, this trend could accelerate the yuan’s use in global energy trade, reinforcing Beijing’s push for financial independence from the West.

    Investment Implications

    Short-term volatility in oil prices Sanctions are likely to constrain Russian supply and put upward pressure on global oil prices. Energy-importing economies like China face higher import costs and potential inflationary effects. Refining margin compression in China Independent refiners reliant on discounted Russian crude may see shrinking margins as discounts narrow and freight costs rise. Yuan internationalisation gains The shift to yuan-settled energy trade supports the longer-term structural trend of de-dollarisation, potentially strengthening the CNY’s role in commodity markets. Energy diversification opportunity China may accelerate efforts to diversify supply — expanding imports from the Middle East, Africa, and Latin America, and boosting LNG investments to mitigate risk.

    Conclusion

    China’s oil trade with Russia is entering a more complex phase.

    While technical avenues remain open for continued imports, they require navigating a narrow path between energy security needs and sanctions compliance risks.

    In the near term, investors should expect higher oil prices, tighter margins for Chinese refiners, and a deeper Russia–China energy alliance built on non-dollar trade channels.

    Over the longer term, these developments could further reshape global energy flows and accelerate the fragmentation of the international oil market.

  • Market Wrap for Week Ending 17 Oct 2025

    US-China Trade Policy Shift Sparks Major Rally

    In a reversal, President Trump announced he would not proceed with previously threatened tariffs on certain Chinese imports. This policy shift sent a wave of optimism through global markets. On Monday, the S&P 500 surged by over 2.3% in its strongest single-day move since May; the Dow and Nasdaq followed, climbing 1.8% and 2.6% respectively. The news also softened volatility indices and led to a risk-on tone. Chinese ETFs like the iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) posted gains of up to 4% for the week.

    Gold Hits New Record Highs on Market Anxiety

    Gold took center stage as its price broke new ground, finishing the week above $4,380 per ounce for the first time ever. This milestone was fueled by persistent investor unease over global credit tightening and a run of mid-sized US regional bank downgrades. On October 15, the SPDR Gold Shares ETF (GLD)—a bellwether for gold investment flows—saw net inflows of $1.2 billion, its highest one-day spike in six months. The rally also reflected rising demand for defensives; precious metals miners like Newmont and Barrick surged between 5–7% over the week.

    US Banking Sector: Strong Results Shadowed by Zions’ Loan Losses

    America’s top banks delivered robust Q3 earnings, led by JPMorgan’s net income of $13.6 billion and a sector-wide profit jump of 19%. Strong investment banking and ongoing consumer lending were the main drivers, underpinning market resilience.​

    However, this upbeat outlook was seriously challenged when Zions Bancorporation announced mid-October it would write off $50–60 million in commercial loans after a high-profile incident of alleged borrower fraud. The loss stemmed from a complex arrangement involving California Bank & Trust and several investment funds, prompting lawsuits aimed at recovering funds and addressing management failures. The immediate impact was dramatic: Zions’ stock plunged 13%, and its market value fell by about $1 billion in a single session, triggering selloffs in regional bank indices and widespread investor concern about credit quality.​

    Despite these problems, Zions’ Q3 results outperformed analyst expectations, with EPS of $1.48–$1.54 and revenue at $872 million. The episode has put a spotlight on risk management and oversight at US regional lenders, intensifying market scrutiny even as major banks continue to report healthy profits.

    Federal Reserve Poised to End Quantitative Tightening

    Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell signalled that the central bank is ready to halt its quantitative tightening program, which has reduced the Fed’s balance sheet from its pandemic-era peak above $9 trillion to around $6.6 trillion as of October. This dovish message, delivered in a speech on October 14, led to a sharp drop in Treasury yields: the 10-year yield fell from 4.45% at the start of the week to 4.27% by Friday. The Fed’s announcement sparked another leg up in equities and offered relief to the housing market and rate-sensitive companies. Analysts now predict the FOMC may officially suspend the balance sheet runoff during its October or December meeting, responding to rising repo market rates and liquidity worries due to larger than usual T-bills issuance.

  • Japan’s Next Prime Minister: Can Takaichi Secure Power Amid Shifting Alliances?

    The Japanese political landscape in October 2025 is more volatile than it has been in decades. Sanae Takaichi, recently elected leader of the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), stands on the cusp of potentially becoming Japan’s next Prime Minister. Yet, even with the LDP as the largest party, her path is fraught with challenges due to the collapse of a 26-year-old coalition and a scramble for new alliances.

    Takaichi’s Odds: From “Shoo-in” to “Challenged Front-Runner”

    Only weeks ago, most pundits considered Takaichi nearly certain to become the first woman to step into Japan’s highest office. Her victory in the LDP leadership race cemented her as the party favorite. However, that façade of inevitability unraveled with the shock exit of Komeito, the LDP’s stalwart coalition partner, leaving the ruling party in a precarious minority position.

    With the LDP now unable to command a straightforward majority in the Diet’s Lower House, opposition parties sense a rare chance for a power shift. The CDP, Democratic Party for the People (DPFP), and Nippon Ishin (Japan Innovation Party) are negotiating a unified challenge, but their divergent policy platforms and ongoing unity talks mean Takaichi’s fate hangs in the balance.

    Parliamentary Breakdown: Who Holds the Balance?

    The Lower House (House of Representatives: 465 seats) seat distribution as of October 2025 is as follows:

    • LDP: 196

    • Komeito: 24 (former partner, now opposition)

    • CDP: ~100

    • DPFP: ~48

    • Nippon Ishin: ~62

    • Japanese Communist Party: ~10

    • Reiwa Shinsengumi: ~8

    • Sanseitō: ~7

    • Others/Independents: ~10

    A governing majority requires 233 seats. The opposition coalition—if it coalesces—has a theoretical shot but isn’t a sure thing. The situation is just as fragmented in the Upper House, where no party or previous coalition commands an outright majority.

    The LDP’s Search for a New Partner

    With Komeito ruled out as a coalition partner due to policy rifts and public fallout from recent scandals, the LDP is searching for fresh allies. Currently, Nippon Ishin no Kai has emerged as their most likely partner. Formal negotiations are underway, with both parties exploring shared platforms on social security and governance. The deal isn’t done—Nippon Ishin leaders have made it clear their support hinges on concrete policy concessions.

    In parallel, the DPFP is also in discussions with both the LDP and the opposition. Their decision could tip the scales, as neither side has locked in their allegiance.

    Why Takaichi Still Has an Edge… For Now

    Despite the storm around her, Takaichi remains the slight favorite for several reasons:

    • LDP remains the largest single party. Even without a majority, it’s better positioned than any rival.

    • No opposition bloc unity… yet. Policy rifts within the CDP, DPFP, and Nippon Ishin may keep them from rallying effectively behind one anti-LDP candidate.

    • Policy bargaining: Nippon Ishin appears open to partnership if its core demands are met.

    • Diet rules favor plurality in deadlock: If both houses disagree, the Lower House’s choice (where LDP is biggest) prevails.

    What Could Change Everything?

    • Opposition unity: If the opposition parties can truly unite, they could potentially topple LDP rule—for the first time in years.

    • Swing votes from minor parties: A few independents joining the anti-LDP coalition would shift the equation.

    • Unforeseen scandal or split: Japanese political history is littered with last-minute surprises.

    The Takeaway

    Japan’s next Prime Minister will be chosen by a Diet more splintered than at any time in the 21st century. Takaichi holds a fragile lead but must urgently secure new coalition partners. Nippon Ishin is her likeliest ally, though real agreement will hinge on the outcome of complex policy talks in the coming days. For political watchers, the outcome is too close to call—a reminder of just how dynamic Japanese democracy can be in moments of coalition realignment. A Takaichi win should bode well for the Japanese stock market.

     

  • Big U.S. Banks Deliver Stellar Q3 2025 Earnings: A Strong Quarter Across the Board

    The third quarter of 2025 has proven to be a standout period for America’s largest financial institutions, with major banks reporting impressive earnings that exceeded analyst expectations and demonstrated the resilience of the U.S. financial sector. From JPMorgan Chase’s robust revenue growth to Goldman Sachs’ surging investment banking fees, the earnings season has painted a picture of a healthy and profitable banking landscape.

    JPMorgan Chase: The Titan Continues to Dominate

    Leading the charge, JPMorgan Chase delivered exceptional results with a 12% year-over-year increase in profit for Q3 2025. The banking giant reported net income of $14.4 billion (or $5.07 per share), while revenue climbed 9% to $47.1 billion—both figures handily beating analyst estimates.

    The bank’s strong performance reflects the continued strength of the U.S. economy and robust consumer spending patterns that have supported both lending and fee-generating activities.

    Bank of America: Investment Banking Prowess Shines

    Bank of America posted perhaps the most impressive growth among the major banks, with profits jumping 23% year-over-year to $8.5 billion ($1.06 per share). This substantial beat of market expectations was primarily driven by strong performance in investment banking and trading businesses, demonstrating the bank’s ability to capitalize on favorable market conditions.

    The bank also raised its net interest income forecast, signaling confidence in future performance and lending growth.

    Wells Fargo: Steady Growth Continues

    Wells Fargo maintained its momentum with a solid 9% increase in profits to $5.59 billion, outpacing last year’s results and contributing to the overall positive narrative for the banking sector.

    Goldman Sachs: Deal-Making Drives Exceptional Returns

    Goldman Sachs emerged as a standout performer, reporting net revenues of $15.18 billion, up 20% compared to the same quarter last year. The investment banking powerhouse saw net earnings reach $4.10 billion, with diluted earnings per share climbing to $12.25 from $8.40 a year ago.

    The firm’s annualized return on equity hit 14.2%, reflecting exceptional operational efficiency. Most notably, investment banking fees rose 42% year-on-year, driven by a rebound in mergers and acquisitions activity and higher debt and equity underwriting.

    Citigroup: Broad-Based Strength Across All Segments

    Citigroup demonstrated remarkable consistency with revenues growing 9% to $22.1 billion and net income climbing 15% to $3.8 billion. What makes Citigroup’s performance particularly impressive is that all business segments posted record numbers, showing broad-based improvements across personal banking, services, wealth management, and markets.

    The bank’s net interest income increased 12%, supported by growth across multiple business lines, though operating expenses also rose 9% due to performance-linked compensation and technology investments.

    Industry-Wide Trends: A Perfect Storm of Positive Factors

    The exceptional performance across major banks reflects several favorable industry trends:

    • Market Records: Stock markets hitting record highs have boosted trading revenues and investment banking fees

    • M&A Activity: A surge in mergers and acquisition activity has driven significant fee income, particularly for Goldman Sachs

    • Economic Resilience: Solid consumer spending and a robust U.S. economy have supported lending and reduced credit concerns

    • Regulatory Environment: A more favorable regulatory landscape has supported growth in fee-generating business lines

    Analysts estimate that profits among the six largest U.S. banks are up roughly 6% compared to Q3 2024, while broader S&P 500 profit growth is expected at 8-9% for the quarter.

    Looking Ahead: Cautious Optimism with Watchful Eyes

    While the results are undeniably strong, bank leaders are maintaining a balanced perspective. They express cautious optimism about the future, noting that solid fundamentals have supported current performance, but remain watchful of potential headwinds including:

    • Geopolitical tensions that could impact global markets

    • Persistent inflation concerns

    • Potential future downturns in markets or credit quality

    Market Response and Stock Performance

    The strong earnings have been well-received by investors, with shares of major banks outperforming the S&P 500 so far in 2025. This outperformance reflects investor confidence in the banks’ ability to generate consistent returns through diverse revenue streams and effective risk management.

    Conclusion: A Sector Firing on All Cylinders

    The Q3 2025 earnings season has demonstrated that America’s largest banks are not just surviving but thriving in the current economic environment. With strong revenue growth, robust investment banking activity, healthy lending portfolios, and effective cost management, these financial institutions are well-positioned to continue delivering value to shareholders while supporting economic growth.

  • The First Brands Group Collapse

    First Brands Group, a major U.S. auto parts maker known for brands such as FRAM and TRICO, filed for bankruptcy at the end of September 2025. The company had grown rapidly by borrowing heavily and using complex financing structures based on invoices and receivables.

    Problems surfaced when lenders discovered that some of these receivables had been pledged more than once as collateral, and that billions of dollars in assets could not be fully accounted for. In mid-September, the company stopped passing payments to a trade-finance fund managed by Jefferies. That broke investor confidence and led to an immediate liquidity crisis.

    The U.S. Department of Justice is now investigating possible financial irregularities, and creditors are seeking an independent audit to trace the missing assets.

    Why it matters

    While few mainstream funds hold direct exposure, this event raises concerns about the hidden risks in private credit and supply-chain finance. These forms of lending often operate with less transparency than traditional bank loans, making it harder for investors to know where the true risks lie.

    The case is being compared to the Greensill Capital collapse in 2021 and may lead to tighter scrutiny of trade-finance funds and other non-bank lenders.

    Key takeaways for investors

    • No systemic risk: The situation is serious but contained. It is unlikely to threaten the broader financial system.
    • Greater caution in private credit: Investors should expect tighter lending standards and slower inflows into trade-finance and receivables-based funds.
    • Diversification remains key: Spread exposures across different sectors and financing styles to reduce concentration risk.

    Background: The Greensill Collapse (2021)

    The Greensill Capital collapse in 2021 provides important context for understanding the First Brands case.

    What happened:
    Greensill Capital was a UK-based finance firm that specialised in supply chain finance — paying suppliers upfront and collecting later from buyers. It then bundled these invoices into investment funds distributed mainly by Credit Suisse.

    However, Greensill began financing anticipated future invoices (sales that had not yet occurred), blurring the line between short-term credit and speculative lending. When insurers withdrew coverage and investors questioned the quality of its receivables, the entire structure unravelled. Greensill filed for bankruptcy in March 2021, leaving Credit Suisse investors facing losses of up to US$5 billion.

    Why it matters:
    The collapse revealed how opaque financing structures can hide true credit risk. In both Greensill and First Brands, complex receivables arrangements made it difficult for lenders and investors to verify the underlying assets. Once confidence broke, liquidity evaporated almost overnight.

    Parallel with First Brands:
    Like Greensill, First Brands relied heavily on receivables-based funding. When lenders discovered missing or double-pledged invoices, it triggered a similar confidence crisis — but this time from the borrower side rather than the intermediary. Both cases show the danger of excessive leverage and limited transparency in private credit markets.

  • Market Wrap for Week Ending 11 Oct 2025

    US-Chinese Trade Tensions Escalate

    President Trump announced new tariff threats against China, proposing hikes from 30% to 100% effective 1 November as a response to China’s expanded rare earth controls and an investigation into Qualcomm. China retaliated with new port fees targeting US ships, causing market unease and triggering one of the steepest selloffs for the Nasdaq 100 in months. Investors now await the outcome of the potential Trump-Xi meeting at the APEC summit in November, which could further influence global trade relations.

    Gaza Ceasefire Deal Reached

    A historic ceasefire agreement was reached in Gaza, mediated by the US, Turkey, Egypt, and Qatar, focusing on a phased hostage exchange and increased humanitarian aid. This reduced geopolitical fears and sent oil prices sharply lower, with WTI crude dropping more than 5% to $58.90.

    US Government Shutdown Impact

    The ongoing US government shutdown moved into its second week, leading to layoffs in key federal agencies and delaying the release of vital economic indicators including the US CPI and jobs reports. The lack of fresh data complicated the Federal Reserve’s October policy assessment, although markets now expect a rate cut at the upcoming meeting.

    Metals Rally as Safe Havens

    Gold broke through the $4,000 mark per ounce and silver surged past $50 for the first time, reflecting a rush to safe assets as investors worried over trade, inflation, and market volatility.

     

  • Japan LDP Leadership Change & Market Implications

    1) Summary of the Leadership Election

    On 4 October 2025, the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) held a leadership election; Sanae Takaichi won the runoff and is positioned to become Japan’s next prime minister. The leadership race was widely interpreted as a pivotal moment: markets expected the winner to set the tone for fiscal policy, BOJ‑government coordination, and Japan’s growth trajectory. Parliament will vote to choose the next prime minister on 15 October 2025.

    2) Takaichi’s Policy Leanings (Market‑Relevant)

    • Fiscal stimulus / reflation bias: she has publicly advocated for aggressive public investment to stimulate demand and lift wages (a return to “Abenomics” style stimulus).
      • Monetary policy stance: she is expected to favor continued accommodative settings (or at least resist aggressive tightening). She has publicly stated that detailed monetary decisions remain BOJ’s prerogative.
      • Strategic / industrial tilt: she has emphasized boosting sectors such as semiconductors, defence, domestic supply chains, and potentially energy / nuclear infrastructure.

    3) Market Reaction (Immediate Moves)

    • Equities: Japanese equity indices surged (Nikkei up ~4–5 %) as markets repriced a more stimulative regime.
      • FX: the yen weakened sharply (USD/JPY broke above ¥150) on greater carry appeal and delayed BOJ tightening expectations.
      • Bonds: Long‑dated JGB yields rose, the yield curve steepened, reflecting heightened term premium and expectations of greater supply / fiscal expansion.

    4) Medium‑Term Macro & Asset Implications (3–12 months)

    • Monetary / FX interplay: The BOJ may delay or moderate tightening; however, if yen weakness becomes excessive, the government or BOJ might intervene (FX intervention or verbal/communication constraints).
      • Bond markets / yields: Fiscal expansion + delayed tightening = upward pressure on long yields and more volatility in the JGB market.
      • Equity / sector impacts: Exporters, industrials, and sectors tied to government infrastructure / defence / tech are likely beneficiaries. Financials are more ambiguous (they may benefit from a steeper curve, but suffer if policy stays too dovish).
      • Cross‑border & macro spillovers: Foreign interest into Japanese assets may rise; weaker yen raises import costs (pressures on trade balance), but stronger domestic growth could offset some of that.
      • Political & implementation risk: The bold policy rhetoric is subject to constraints (intra‑party consensus, budget limits, institutional resistance). If stimulus delivery disappoints, optimism could reverse.

    Bottom Line

    The change in leadership is clearly bullish for Japanese equities and assets more broadly: the policy shift toward fiscal stimulus, continued monetary accommodation, and strategic industrial support all favor a positive backdrop for those invested in Japan. The risk of abrupt yen intervention or policy mis-step is a caveat, but overall the directional bias is supportive.

  • Primer on U.S. Government Shutdowns and Market Implications

    What is a Government Shutdown?

    A U.S. government shutdown occurs when Congress fails to pass appropriations bills or a continuing resolution to fund federal agencies. Non-essential federal employees are placed on unpaid leave, and many government services pause. Essential services, such as national security and public safety, continue. It is distinct from a debt-ceiling crisis, which threatens U.S. Treasury default and carries much greater systemic risk.

    Historical Context

    Shutdowns became more common after the 1980s, following legal rulings that required agencies to cease operations without appropriations. Notable shutdowns include the 1995–96 standoff (21 days), the 2013 shutdown (16 days), and the 2018–19 partial shutdown (35 days, the longest in history). These events disrupted federal operations and caused temporary economic costs, but markets generally recovered.

    How Markets React

    Historically, markets tend to view shutdowns as short-term disruptions rather than systemic risks. The S&P 500 often shows volatility during the event, but performance three months later is typically more influenced by macroeconomic and monetary factors. Treasury markets generally remain stable unless linked to debt-ceiling risk. Sector-specific effects are more pronounced, particularly in defence contractors, healthcare services reliant on federal approvals, and regions with heavy federal employment.

    S&P 500 Performance During Past Shutdowns

    The table below summarises the S&P 500’s performance three months after the start of major U.S. government shutdowns since 1990.

     

    Near-Term Implications for Financial Markets (Next 3 Months)

    In the near term, shutdowns can cause headline risk and elevated volatility. Short shutdowns (days to two weeks) tend to have limited impact, with markets resuming prior trends quickly. Prolonged shutdowns (three weeks or longer) can weigh on GDP growth and earnings season, particularly in sectors tied to federal spending. However, history suggests shutdowns alone do not trigger systemic downturns unless tied to a debt-ceiling standoff.

  • Market Wrap For The Week Ending 26 Sep 2025

    US Inflation Maintains FED’s Rate Path

    The US PCE inflation reading for August came in at 2.7%, matching expectations. So did core PCE. The data gave markets some breathing room that inflation is under control, but also take away the expectations that the FED may cut aggressively.

    US GDP Revision Complicates The Inflation Outlook

    Q2 GDP was revised upwards to 3.8%, the strongest since Q3 of 2023. With stronger growth, the odds of aggressive rate cuts are likely to fall. Highly valued stocks may come under pressure. Already, Oracle lost 8% on Friday.

    Trump’s Latest Tariffs

    The U.S. administration unveiled sharp new tariffs: 100% on branded pharmaceuticals, 25% on heavy trucks, and additional levies on other goods. These moves have unnerved markets because they could stoke inflation (via import cost pass-through) and complicate global supply chains and trade flows. Markets appear to be taking it in its stride. The Pharmaceutical ETF traded higher on Friday.

    China’s Industrial Profits Rebound

    Chinese industrial profits grew 20.4% year-on-year for August, reversing recent declines, and year-to-date profits rose 0.9%. The rebound suggests that some corporate margin pressures are easing, which could alleviate concerns about cascading defaults or severe weakness in the industrial sector. The key is always sustainability, so we need to watch for Sep and Oct numbers. That said, the strength of the Chinese stock market cannot be ignored.